You are doing Scrum but the Scrum Master tells the team what to do!
Explains why Scrum Masters should not direct teams, emphasising self-organisation, shared responsibility, and the importance of team autonomy in Scrum …
TL;DR; The Scrum Master is responsible for removing impediments, but should only step in when the team cannot resolve the issue themselves. Their focus should be on enabling the team to handle similar problems independently in the future, building self-sufficiency. Development managers should encourage Scrum Masters to coach teams rather than always solving problems for them.
As part of the Scrum .org webinar “Ask a Professional Scrum Trainer - Martin Hinshelwood - Answering Your Most Pressing Scrum Questions” I was asked a number of questions. Since not only was I on the spot and live, I thought that I should answer each question that was asked again here, as well as those questions I did not get to.
In case you missed it, here is the recording of yesterday’s Ask a Professional Scrum Trainer webinar with Martin Hinshelwood! Watch here: http://ow.ly/ijiM50vwEkD
Yes, the Scrum Master should always remove Impediments. That is their responsibility on the Scrum Team . However, what is an impediment?
An Impediment is something that impedes [slows] a Teams progress, and that they are unable to deal with themselves.
Both parts of this are critical. Often the Scrum Master will head off on a mission to solve an impediment that is not really an impediment. They need to stop and ask themselves:
If after both of these questions have been fully explored the item still looks like an Impediment then the Scrum Master should work to resolve it, all the while thinking about what they could do to enable the Team to be able to solve them on their own. The future of the Scrum Master is to make the Scrum Team as self-sufficient as posible, within the bounds of their organisation, so that they can go tackle some of those organisational impediments that are preventing even more maturity.
While there are no right answers there are some answers that are better than others. For your given situation select the most right answer, and iteration to the best version of it.
Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Boxit Document Solutions
New Signature
NIT A/S
Boeing
ProgramUtvikling
Lockheed Martin
Slicedbread
Trayport
Workday
Slaughter and May
Higher Education Statistics Agency
Hubtel Ghana
Philips
Qualco
MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.
Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)
Brandes Investment Partners L.P.
Graham & Brown
Washington Department of Transport
Royal Air Force
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Nottingham County Council
Washington Department of Enterprise Services
Ghana Police Service
Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)
Emerson Process Management
Trayport
Freadom
DFDS
Lean SA