Why is Lego a shit idea for a scrum trainer - Part 3

Published
Written by Our People
2 minute read

Finding the Right Balance between Simplicity and Complexity 🧱 

In our pursuit to find effective tools for Scrum training, we’ve pondered over various alternatives. Lego, while popular, is noticeably absent from our toolkit. This choice isn’t arbitrary; it’s a deliberate decision stemming from our commitment to creating a realistic and impactful learning experience. While Lego’s structured simplicity may seem appealing for illustrating concepts, it often falls short in conveying the dynamic and often chaotic world of Scrum.  

This realisation has led us to explore other avenues that better encapsulate the essence of what we aim to teach. 

Minecraft: A Paradox of Preference🎮 

You might ask, if not Lego, then what?  

Surprisingly, we’ve sometimes turned to the digital realms of Minecraft, and here’s why: it’s all about the nuance between simplicity and complexity. 

How Does Minecraft Differ from Lego? 🤔 

On the surface, both Lego and Minecraft might seem like playful tools. However, the distinction lies in the experience they deliver. 

Striking the Right Balance ⚖️ 

Leveraging tools effectively means striking a balance. While Lego might trivialize, Minecraft serves to exemplify and make participants feel the pressure of complexity. 

The Tool Matters Less Than the Experience 🛠️ 

At the end of the day, whether it’s Lego, Minecraft, or any other tool, what matters is how effectively we can convey the complexities and intricacies of Scrum practices.

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients​

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.​