a·gen·tic a·gil·i·ty

Why Measuring Individual Cycle Time Fails to Help Teams

TL;DR; Measuring individual cycle time does not help teams improve because it focuses on people instead of the overall system. Real bottlenecks come from process issues like queues and overloaded work, not individual speed. To improve team performance, focus on system-level metrics such as lead time, throughput, and process efficiency, and address process bottlenecks rather than monitoring individuals.

Published on
1 minute read
Image
https://nkdagility.com/resources/ZZGeHcnIwyQ
Subscribe

I still see teams measuring individual cycle time as if that tells them anything useful. It doesn’t.

If you’re measuring a person’s speed, you’re missing the point. The problem is never the individual—it’s the system they’re operating in. You don’t measure a single cog in a machine; you measure how well the whole thing runs.

When work sits in queues, when reviews take forever, when people are overloaded with work in progress—those are the real bottlenecks. Measuring how fast someone moves a ticket through their own swim lane tells you nothing about flow.

Want to move faster? Stop monitoring individuals. Start looking at lead time, throughput, and process cycle efficiency (PCE). Fix the system, and the people will be able to do great work.

Where have you seen individual measurement lead to bad incentives? Drop your thoughts in the comments.

Also published on: LinkedIn
Smart Classifications

Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.

Subscribe

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients​

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.​

Microsoft Logo

Microsoft

MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd. Logo

MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.

NIT A/S

Trayport Logo

Trayport

Freadom Logo

Freadom

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation Logo

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation

Boxit Document Solutions Logo

Boxit Document Solutions

Bistech Logo

Bistech

Sage Logo

Sage

ProgramUtvikling Logo

ProgramUtvikling

Kongsberg Maritime Logo

Kongsberg Maritime

Jack Links Logo

Jack Links

SuperControl Logo

SuperControl

Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company) Logo

Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)

Boeing Logo

Boeing

Philips Logo

Philips

New Signature Logo

New Signature

Higher Education Statistics Agency Logo

Higher Education Statistics Agency

Washington Department of Transport Logo

Washington Department of Transport

New Hampshire Supreme Court Logo

New Hampshire Supreme Court

Ghana Police Service Logo

Ghana Police Service

Nottingham County Council Logo

Nottingham County Council

Washington Department of Enterprise Services Logo

Washington Department of Enterprise Services

Department of Work and Pensions (UK) Logo

Department of Work and Pensions (UK)

Trayport Logo

Trayport

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG) Logo

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)

Milliman Logo

Milliman

Kongsberg Maritime Logo

Kongsberg Maritime

Ericson Logo

Ericson

Philips Logo

Philips