a·gen·tic a·gil·i·ty

Why compromising on software quality is a leadership decision

TL;DR; Compromising on software quality is a leadership decision, not a team one, and lowering standards to meet deadlines carries business risks that should be explicitly approved by leadership. A clear Definition of Done helps maintain consistent quality, and any decision to reduce it should be transparent and deliberate. Development managers should ensure quality expectations are set and upheld at the leadership level, not left to teams under delivery pressure.

Published on
1 minute read
Image
https://nkdagility.com/resources/3YDTlhSlU4A
Subscribe

Would your CFO sign off on a financial report that was “mostly accurate”? Would your legal team approve a contract that “should be enforceable”? No?

Then why do organisations think it’s acceptable to compromise on software quality?

A strong Definition of Done prevents cutting corners. It ensures every increment meets the same professional standard. Reducing quality to meet deadlines is a financial decision, not a team decision. If leadership wants to change the quality bar, they should sign off on the risks—not sneak it past teams under the banner of “Agile.”

Scrum teams don’t get to lower quality. And if your teams are being asked to, the real conversation should be happening in the boardroom.

Has your leadership ever knowingly shipped bad software?

[the article is linked in the comments]

Also published on: LinkedIn
Smart Classifications

Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.

Subscribe

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients​

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.​

Higher Education Statistics Agency Logo

Higher Education Statistics Agency

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG) Logo

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)

Qualco Logo

Qualco

Ericson Logo

Ericson

Akaditi Logo

Akaditi

Brandes Investment Partners L.P. Logo

Brandes Investment Partners L.P.

DFDS Logo

DFDS

Lean SA Logo

Lean SA

Slaughter and May Logo

Slaughter and May

Illumina Logo

Illumina

Deliotte Logo

Deliotte

Milliman Logo

Milliman

Trayport Logo

Trayport

ALS Life Sciences Logo

ALS Life Sciences

YearUp.org Logo

YearUp.org

Kongsberg Maritime Logo

Kongsberg Maritime

Jack Links Logo

Jack Links

Emerson Process Management Logo

Emerson Process Management

New Hampshire Supreme Court Logo

New Hampshire Supreme Court

Department of Work and Pensions (UK) Logo

Department of Work and Pensions (UK)

Washington Department of Enterprise Services Logo

Washington Department of Enterprise Services

Royal Air Force Logo

Royal Air Force

Ghana Police Service Logo

Ghana Police Service

Washington Department of Transport Logo

Washington Department of Transport

Healthgrades Logo

Healthgrades

Workday Logo

Workday

MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd. Logo

MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.

Kongsberg Maritime Logo

Kongsberg Maritime

Lockheed Martin Logo

Lockheed Martin

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd Logo

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd