If your business truly understood the risk of technical debt, you wouldn’t accept any of it.
There’s a myth that “some level of technical debt is manageable.” But let’s be clear—technical debt is 100% risk. It’s an unhedged fund with no asset securing it, no insurance to mitigate it. The cost isn’t just in future refactoring; it’s in lost time, lost agility, and lost opportunities.
At Microsoft, TFS was delivered on a two-year cycle. By 2012, with 600 engineers, they were shipping just 24 features a year. Technical debt had turned a powerhouse into a bottleneck. It wasn’t until they embraced 3-week Sprints and tackled the underlying debt that they regained agility.
This isn’t just an engineering problem. It’s a business problem. If you think you can hide technical debt in a cost centre forever, think again.
How does your organisation treat technical debt? As a calculated risk or an unrecognised liability?
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Teleplan
NIT A/S
Lean SA
Hubtel Ghana
Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)
Graham & Brown
Brandes Investment Partners L.P.
Lockheed Martin
Big Data for Humans
YearUp.org
DFDS
Ericson
Deliotte
Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd
Workday
Boxit Document Solutions
Sage
Illumina
Nottingham County Council
Ghana Police Service
Washington Department of Enterprise Services
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Royal Air Force
Department of Work and Pensions (UK)
Kongsberg Maritime
DFDS
Trayport
Schlumberger
Slaughter and May
Illumina