If your business truly understood the risk of technical debt, you wouldn’t accept any of it.
There’s a myth that “some level of technical debt is manageable.” But let’s be clear—technical debt is 100% risk. It’s an unhedged fund with no asset securing it, no insurance to mitigate it. The cost isn’t just in future refactoring; it’s in lost time, lost agility, and lost opportunities.
At Microsoft, TFS was delivered on a two-year cycle. By 2012, with 600 engineers, they were shipping just 24 features a year. Technical debt had turned a powerhouse into a bottleneck. It wasn’t until they embraced 3-week Sprints and tackled the underlying debt that they regained agility.
This isn’t just an engineering problem. It’s a business problem. If you think you can hide technical debt in a cost centre forever, think again.
How does your organisation treat technical debt? As a calculated risk or an unrecognised liability?
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Deliotte
Lean SA
MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.
Slaughter and May
Schlumberger
Qualco
Milliman
Higher Education Statistics Agency
Lockheed Martin
NIT A/S
Workday
Alignment Healthcare
YearUp.org
Slicedbread
Philips
Teleplan
Emerson Process Management
DFDS
Royal Air Force
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Nottingham County Council
Ghana Police Service
Department of Work and Pensions (UK)
Washington Department of Transport
Lean SA
Illumina
Milliman
Qualco
Hubtel Ghana
Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)