The True Risk of Technical Debt in Business
Technical debt poses significant business risks, reducing agility, slowing innovation, and causing lost opportunities. Addressing it is crucial for …
TL;DR; Technical debt is always harmful and should not be considered acceptable; it slows onboarding, increases errors, and creates inefficiency. It accumulates quickly and can suddenly halt delivery, as seen in Microsoft’s experience before they overhauled their processes and addressed their debt. Development managers should prioritize identifying and reducing technical debt now rather than accepting it as normal.
Let’s put this to rest: there’s no such thing as “good” technical debt.
If new engineers take weeks to become productive, your system is unreadable. If every change introduces faults, your architecture is fragile. If you’re manually handling tasks that should be automated, you’re building inefficiency into your process.
And here’s the kicker—technical debt doesn’t accumulate linearly. It builds up silently, then one day, it collapses your ability to deliver.
Microsoft learned this the hard way with TFS. They were shipping 24 features per year across a team of 600 engineers. The solution? A complete overhaul in how they worked. They moved to 3-week Sprints, embraced transparency, and started paying back their technical debt.
Stop normalising dysfunction. There’s no “acceptable level” of technical debt—only risk you haven’t accounted for yet.
What’s stopping your team from tackling technical debt head-on?
Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Higher Education Statistics Agency
Xceptor - Process and Data Automation
Lockheed Martin
NIT A/S
Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)
Boxit Document Solutions
Ericson
Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)
Boeing
Alignment Healthcare
Qualco
Brandes Investment Partners L.P.
Jack Links
Healthgrades
Workday
Schlumberger
Microsoft
YearUp.org
Royal Air Force
Nottingham County Council
Department of Work and Pensions (UK)
Washington Department of Enterprise Services
Washington Department of Transport
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Trayport
ALS Life Sciences
Kongsberg Maritime
Lockheed Martin
Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd
NIT A/S