a·gen·tic a·gil·i·ty

There no such thing as "good" technical debt

TL;DR; Technical debt is always harmful and should not be considered acceptable; it slows onboarding, increases errors, and creates inefficiency. It accumulates quickly and can suddenly halt delivery, as seen in Microsoft’s experience before they overhauled their processes and addressed their debt. Development managers should prioritize identifying and reducing technical debt now rather than accepting it as normal.

Published on
1 minute read
Image
https://nkdagility.com/resources/lLNjkL_zGQa
Subscribe

Let’s put this to rest: there’s no such thing as “good” technical debt.

If new engineers take weeks to become productive, your system is unreadable. If every change introduces faults, your architecture is fragile. If you’re manually handling tasks that should be automated, you’re building inefficiency into your process.

And here’s the kicker—technical debt doesn’t accumulate linearly. It builds up silently, then one day, it collapses your ability to deliver.

Microsoft learned this the hard way with TFS. They were shipping 24 features per year across a team of 600 engineers. The solution? A complete overhaul in how they worked. They moved to 3-week Sprints, embraced transparency, and started paying back their technical debt.

Stop normalising dysfunction. There’s no “acceptable level” of technical debt—only risk you haven’t accounted for yet.

What’s stopping your team from tackling technical debt head-on?

Also published on: LinkedIn
Smart Classifications

Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.

Subscribe

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients​

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.​

Higher Education Statistics Agency Logo

Higher Education Statistics Agency

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation Logo

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation

Lockheed Martin Logo

Lockheed Martin

NIT A/S

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG) Logo

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)

Boxit Document Solutions Logo

Boxit Document Solutions

Ericson Logo

Ericson

Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company) Logo

Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)

Boeing Logo

Boeing

Alignment Healthcare Logo

Alignment Healthcare

Qualco Logo

Qualco

Brandes Investment Partners L.P. Logo

Brandes Investment Partners L.P.

Jack Links Logo

Jack Links

Healthgrades Logo

Healthgrades

Workday Logo

Workday

Schlumberger Logo

Schlumberger

Microsoft Logo

Microsoft

YearUp.org Logo

YearUp.org

Royal Air Force Logo

Royal Air Force

Nottingham County Council Logo

Nottingham County Council

Department of Work and Pensions (UK) Logo

Department of Work and Pensions (UK)

Washington Department of Enterprise Services Logo

Washington Department of Enterprise Services

Washington Department of Transport Logo

Washington Department of Transport

New Hampshire Supreme Court Logo

New Hampshire Supreme Court

Trayport Logo

Trayport

ALS Life Sciences Logo

ALS Life Sciences

Kongsberg Maritime Logo

Kongsberg Maritime

Lockheed Martin Logo

Lockheed Martin

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd Logo

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd

NIT A/S