Hosted Team Foundation Server
Explains challenges of hosting Team Foundation Server, including project isolation issues, upcoming improvements, and the availability of commercial …
TL;DR; Explores options for hosting the TFS Automation Platform, comparing server-side and client-only setups, and discusses impacts on functionality, resilience, and multi-user support.
I have been asked what would be the process or support for hosting the Tfs Automation Platform either from a hosting provider, or in the cloud if we have server side components. If you are not familiar with TFS on Azure make sure you read:
note: This product is still under development and this document is subject to change. There is also the strong possibility that these are just rambling fantasies of a mad programmer with an architect complex.
The Platform architecture currently involves extensive server side components. In fact almost all of the functionality is provided from the server from configuration to implementation.
I have thought about this a lot and although I recognise the problem I would not want to sacrifice functionality for this scenario. Although some of the functionality would be possible a large chuck of possible features as well as all of the resilience would be severely impaired by removing the server side components.
It would be up to the hosting provider to install the server-side components to enable the user to use this system. Think of it like the Wordpress Plugin system. Some hosting providers allow you to have any plugin you like, while others require that you can only select from a list of approved plugins.
I would want to make it as easy as possible to configure the hosted TFS server to only load “Automation packages” from a Store provided by the host themselves. For example if they deployed a managed server on “nwcadence.tfsazure.com” they would also deploy the server side components and configure it to look at “automationstore.tfsazure.com” that would provide a vetted list of add-ons. I do want to look at the possibility of having a kind of “validated proxy” as part of the store so a “Super Admin” can log into the proxy and approve updates and new Automations from the central store.
In saying that, although I have thought about it, that by no means guarantees that this feature will be above the cut line for Release 1.
Boy, I am sounding more Microsoft by the year!
I would be very interested in what you think of the option to have a client only install.
What functionality would we loose if we settled for client ony:
What do you think, are the features above important?
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Higher Education Statistics Agency
Philips
Trayport
Teleplan
Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)
Akaditi
Boeing
Xceptor - Process and Data Automation
Lean SA
MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.
Freadom
Lockheed Martin
Brandes Investment Partners L.P.
New Signature
Genus Breeding Ltd
Deliotte
Slaughter and May
Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)
Department of Work and Pensions (UK)
Nottingham County Council
Royal Air Force
Washington Department of Transport
Ghana Police Service
New Hampshire Supreme Court
SuperControl
Higher Education Statistics Agency
YearUp.org
ALS Life Sciences
Jack Links
CR2