a·gen·tic a·gil·i·ty

TFS Integration Tools - Issue: TFS WIT invalid submission conflict type

TL;DR; Explains how to resolve the “TFS WIT invalid submission conflict” in TFS Integration Tools by adjusting permissions and enabling bypass-rule submission for successful configuration.

Published on
2 minute read
Image
https://nkdagility.com/resources/vrpjXVvhpYA
Subscribe

Immediately after configuring the TFS Integration Tools you receive a  TFS WIT invalid submission conflict type that states that the source item is invalid.

TFS Integration Tools - Issue: TFS WIT invalid submission conflict type

Figure: The source item is invalid

There is no further debug information.

Applies to

Findings

While this immediately looks like a problem with the configuration and can indeed be related to a configuration or date conversation issue if you have just installed the TFS Integration Tools there may be a simpler resolution.

The first thing to do is to enable TFS WIT bypass-rule submission rule in the configuration and make sure that your account is in the “Service Accounts Group”.

TFS Integration Tools - Issue: TFS WIT invalid submission conflict type

Figure: Access Denied

If however you get “Access denied” with you account not having “Edit collection-level information” then the account that you are using to access TFS does not have the correct permission.

Solution

You need to make sure that the account under which you are running the TFS Integration Tools is at least a “Collection Administrator” and preferably a “Team Foundation Administrator”. There are many things that the TFS Integration Tools do that requires this level of permission.

note: I recommend building and testing all of your scripts/configurations against a test server, or at the very least a throw-away collection before you work against production.

You should now be able to successfully run your configuration although I can’t guarantee further errors TFS Integration Tools - Issue: TFS WIT invalid submission conflict type

Smart Classifications

Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.

Subscribe

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients​

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.​

Freadom Logo

Freadom

Sage Logo

Sage

Jack Links Logo

Jack Links

Workday Logo

Workday

Epic Games Logo

Epic Games

Brandes Investment Partners L.P. Logo

Brandes Investment Partners L.P.

Ericson Logo

Ericson

Emerson Process Management Logo

Emerson Process Management

Microsoft Logo

Microsoft

Philips Logo

Philips

Slicedbread Logo

Slicedbread

MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd. Logo

MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.

Kongsberg Maritime Logo

Kongsberg Maritime

Graham & Brown Logo

Graham & Brown

Lockheed Martin Logo

Lockheed Martin

ALS Life Sciences Logo

ALS Life Sciences

Genus Breeding Ltd Logo

Genus Breeding Ltd

Lean SA Logo

Lean SA

Washington Department of Enterprise Services Logo

Washington Department of Enterprise Services

Department of Work and Pensions (UK) Logo

Department of Work and Pensions (UK)

Washington Department of Transport Logo

Washington Department of Transport

New Hampshire Supreme Court Logo

New Hampshire Supreme Court

Ghana Police Service Logo

Ghana Police Service

Royal Air Force Logo

Royal Air Force

Big Data for Humans Logo

Big Data for Humans

Illumina Logo

Illumina

Kongsberg Maritime Logo

Kongsberg Maritime

Genus Breeding Ltd Logo

Genus Breeding Ltd

ProgramUtvikling Logo

ProgramUtvikling

Freadom Logo

Freadom