Challenging Misconceptions in Agile Teams
Explores common misconceptions about Agile teams, clarifying that true agility demands discipline, planning, and professionalism—not chaos or lack of …
Highlights the importance of professionalism in agile teams, warning against excusing unprofessional behaviour as agility and stressing ethical, competent practices for true agility.
In Scrum Events across the world, I hear repeated the phrase “that’s how agile works” when describing behaviours that are both unprofessional and the very opposite of an agile mindset. These behaviours will inhibit agility and are a result of a lack of understanding of the underlying principles.
We need to stop normalising unprofessional behaviour and call it out whenever we hear it.
In order for agility to function, we need professionalism; a focus on doing things right so that we don’t end up with our beards caught in the mailbox (Norwegian saying). Agility requires more planning, more knowledge, more diligence, more discipline, and more competence … not less! It’s harder to use agile practices as we are expected to have a usable product at all times, well, at least every iteration of a few weeks. We are most definitely not agile if:
We don’t have a usable increment at the end of every iteration -
We constantly take on work that we don’t understand enough to have a reasonable degree of certainty that it will be completed within the timebox
Our team members don’t understand how their daily work contributes to the goals and vision of the product
We have a Tactical Goal that reflects a list of work to be completed
We assign work to individuals and hold them accountable as such
We create and organize ability-based groups within our team; programmers, testers, operations
You have a deployment process that is not within the control of the Scrum Team or is linear and bureaucratic.
You have a fixed set of requirements that cant be changed based on feedback
In the traditional world these behaviours were still present, however they were mitigated by time… lots and lots of time.
Think about the lead software engineer at Volkswagen that got a 3-year prison sentence for following orders and writing code that disabled the catalytic convertor when under emissions tests.
Think about the engineers at Boeing that dont yet know their fate over the 737 Max.
When you don’t know that these behaviours have a negative impact on our ability to deliver its ignorance, once you know and do it anyway, it’s incompetence. We have a moral and ethical responsibility to do the right thing, to protect our customer, our company, and ourselves.
Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Big Data for Humans
Lockheed Martin
Emerson Process Management
Sage
Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd
Microsoft
ProgramUtvikling
Kongsberg Maritime
Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)
Hubtel Ghana
Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)
Ericson
Deliotte
Workday
Genus Breeding Ltd
CR2
Qualco
Epic Games
Royal Air Force
Department of Work and Pensions (UK)
Ghana Police Service
Nottingham County Council
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Washington Department of Enterprise Services
Freadom
Graham & Brown
YearUp.org
DFDS
SuperControl
Boxit Document Solutions