a·gen·tic a·gil·i·ty

Risk Mitigation: Agile Usable Products vs Documentation in Traditional Project Management

TL;DR; Delivering working software in small increments helps teams identify and address risks early, adapt to changes quickly, and get real feedback from users, while relying mainly on documentation can slow response to shifting needs. Documentation is still important, but focusing on usable products provides more value in fast-changing environments. Development managers should prioritize building and validating working software while maintaining just enough documentation to support adaptation and clarity.

Published on
3 minute read
Image
https://nkdagility.com/resources/vkqr5T9YVsf
Subscribe
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

As the software development landscape evolves, evaluating the time-tested traditional project management strategies alongside the burgeoning agile methodologies is essential. The central tenet I would like to explore today is comparing using usable working products as a risk mitigation strategy in Agile with the elaborate documentation characteristic of traditional project management.

TL;DR:

Agile’s emphasis on incremental development with working software mitigates risks efficiently by validating real-world use early and continuously. Traditional project management often leans towards exhaustive documentation, which, although it provides an essential framework, can be sluggish and less adaptive to change. While documentation is crucial, Agile’s approach to building usable increments might prove more valuable in the rapidly evolving product world.

Agile’s Usable Working Products

Agile approaches, such as Scrum , lay the foundation for teams to focus on delivering working software incrementally. This pragmatic strategy creates an environment where the product is continuously validated, improved, and adapted to customer needs and market conditions. Through DevOps practices and automation, engineering excellence forms the backbone of this approach.

Picture this - Your team is building an innovative web application. By focusing on creating minimal product and incrementally adding features through continuous integration and deployment, you swiftly detect issues, adjust to market changes, and receive customer feedback. Essentially, you have a pulse on the real-world application of your product.

This brings me to the very essence of why Agile is increasingly alluring - Continuous Validation and Adaptation. It’s the ability to say, “Here’s what we built; let’s test, deploy, and improve.” You sidestep the monolithic menace of releasing a massive project only to discover that some features are irrelevant, or worse, the product is plagued with issues.

However, Agile’s approach demands a high degree of discipline, collaboration, and transparency among team members. Moreover, the working product might be partial in terms of features but must be free from critical defects.

Traditional Project Management’s Documentation

Traditional project management, often associated with Waterfall methodology, emphasises thorough documentation and upfront planning. Every requirement, specification, and design element is meticulously detailed. This documentation can serve as an essential blueprint, ensuring that everyone is on the same page, literally.

However, extensive documentation might lead you down a path where adaptation is strenuous. As we know, change is the only constant, especially in technology. What if a competitor launches a similar product, or there’s a shift in customer preferences? Rigid adherence to documentation without real-world validation until late in the project could spell catastrophe.

Don’t get me wrong – Documentation is vital, but less so than working product. But should it be the centre stage, or can it be adaptive?

Striking the Balance

Agile’s approach to delivering working products empowers teams to build trust with stakeholders through transparency and early delivery of value. It’s about being adaptive, receiving feedback, and incrementally enhancing the product.

Traditional project management practices can still be indispensable in providing an initial framework. Still, overemphasising will impair the ability to swiftly navigate the turbulent waters of the market.

In preparing for battle, I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable! - Dwight D. Eisenhower

The agile philosophy does not say that documentation or planning is useless. This is a common misconception. It does, however, say that adapting to change is more important than following the plan and, more critically, that working product I more valuable than comprehensive documentation.

Documentation does not solve a business problem; it merely describes it or a solution for it.

To the professional teams, don’t be afraid to embrace Agile’s working products as a lifeline for risk mitigation. Simultaneously, weave in the essential strands of documentation, but with the agility to adapt.

Smart Classifications

Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.

Subscribe

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients​

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.​

YearUp.org Logo

YearUp.org

Schlumberger Logo

Schlumberger

Healthgrades Logo

Healthgrades

Qualco Logo

Qualco

Boeing Logo

Boeing

Philips Logo

Philips

Sage Logo

Sage

Big Data for Humans Logo

Big Data for Humans

Boxit Document Solutions Logo

Boxit Document Solutions

Graham & Brown Logo

Graham & Brown

Trayport Logo

Trayport

Epic Games Logo

Epic Games

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd Logo

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG) Logo

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)

SuperControl Logo

SuperControl

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation Logo

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation

Ericson Logo

Ericson

Teleplan Logo

Teleplan

Department of Work and Pensions (UK) Logo

Department of Work and Pensions (UK)

Washington Department of Transport Logo

Washington Department of Transport

Washington Department of Enterprise Services Logo

Washington Department of Enterprise Services

Royal Air Force Logo

Royal Air Force

New Hampshire Supreme Court Logo

New Hampshire Supreme Court

Nottingham County Council Logo

Nottingham County Council

Slaughter and May Logo

Slaughter and May

Big Data for Humans Logo

Big Data for Humans

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd Logo

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd

Milliman Logo

Milliman

Ericson Logo

Ericson

Schlumberger Logo

Schlumberger