a·gen·tic a·gil·i·ty

Quality enablement to achieve predictable delivery

Explains how defining quality standards, acceptance criteria, and automation in software delivery leads to predictable outcomes, fewer bugs, and improved team performance.

Published on
4 minute read
Image
https://nkdagility.com/resources/Qvzmat4E5NB
Subscribe

You need quality enablement to achieve predictable delivery for your organisation which takes effort to achieve.

I do a lot of ALM Assessments for companies and almost every customer that I speak to has unpredictable quality in the software delivery that they receive from their teams. This is not always the Development Teams fault and is often the result of an organisation that is finely tuned to minimise the ability to have a defined and predictable level of quality. In most cases this is due to a lack of a bar that quantifies the minimum things that need to be completed in order for and organisation to understand what i involved in each delivery.

If you have no bar for delivery and thus no idea what needs to be completed for each thing to be delivered then how can you expect to make accurate (or at least as good as we can get) prediction on when things are going to be delivered? You would effectively have no empirical evidence to rely on for predictability of delivery. In addition, the varied quality level results in more bugs in production, which then puts those individuals’ responsible for adding features under more pressure. If you put developers under pressure they will consistently and increasingly cut quality to meet the same deliverable.

Quality enablement to achieve predictable delivery

Figure: The Iron Triangle

In addition many product backlogs lack acceptance criteria leaving the Development Team to guess at the basis by which the customer will accept that something is complete. Indeed because if this lack of acceptance criteria backlog items can often be deceptively large which puts the development team under greater pleasure for delivery and thus the cut quality.

Fix quality for improved predictability

The only way to successfully create predictable software delivery is to fix 3 of the 4 points of the Iron Triangle. In traditional software development quality is the hidden value and if you fix everything else it is Quality that suffers. Quality should be anchored with an explicit definition.

Doing all of these things will serve to make quality the goal not the lack of it.

Conclusion

The way that we have traditionally measured our development teams have finely tuned them to fluctuate quality in order to meet aggressive delivery schedules. However this fluctuating quality only serves to reduce our ability to deliver and annoy our customers when they find the resulting bugs.

The goal is to increase quality not reduce it but first we need to be able to measure that quality and enforce it.

Operational Practices Pragmatic Thinking Product Delivery Software Development Engineering Practices … 4 more Working Software Value Delivery Continuous Delivery Technical Excellence
Subscribe

Related blog

No related videos found.

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients​

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.​

Boxit Document Solutions Logo

Boxit Document Solutions

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG) Logo

Cognizant Microsoft Business Group (MBG)

Trayport Logo

Trayport

Freadom Logo

Freadom

SuperControl Logo

SuperControl

Deliotte Logo

Deliotte

Boeing Logo

Boeing

Milliman Logo

Milliman

Schlumberger Logo

Schlumberger

ProgramUtvikling Logo

ProgramUtvikling

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd Logo

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd

Big Data for Humans Logo

Big Data for Humans

Hubtel Ghana Logo

Hubtel Ghana

Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company) Logo

Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)

Akaditi Logo

Akaditi

Slicedbread Logo

Slicedbread

YearUp.org Logo

YearUp.org

Slaughter and May Logo

Slaughter and May

Royal Air Force Logo

Royal Air Force

Washington Department of Transport Logo

Washington Department of Transport

Department of Work and Pensions (UK) Logo

Department of Work and Pensions (UK)

Washington Department of Enterprise Services Logo

Washington Department of Enterprise Services

Ghana Police Service Logo

Ghana Police Service

Nottingham County Council Logo

Nottingham County Council

Brandes Investment Partners L.P. Logo

Brandes Investment Partners L.P.

Healthgrades Logo

Healthgrades

YearUp.org Logo

YearUp.org

Qualco Logo

Qualco

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation Logo

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation

Genus Breeding Ltd Logo

Genus Breeding Ltd