DevOps
is not automation. It is not pipelines. It is not “shifting left” while locking decision-making into ancient
release management
bureaucracies.
DevOps is agency. It is the union of people, process, and products to enable continuous delivery of value to our end users.
If your developers do not have operational agency—control over environments, deployments, telemetry, and remediation—you are not doing DevOps.
You are automating fragility.
We have already established that
production is the only place real feedback happens
. UAT, staging, demo environments—none of these reveal how real users behave, where real bottlenecks emerge, or where real pain points lie.
Real outcomes, real telemetry, and real consequences only happen in production.
If developers do not have operational authority over production, they are blindfolded. They can build, but they cannot learn. They can deploy, but they cannot observe. They can script, but they cannot improve.
Without production feedback, Continuous Delivery collapses into Continuous Guessing.
Most so-called “DevOps transformations” fail because they stop at tooling. They build beautiful pipelines that developers cannot influence. They deploy artifacts that developers cannot monitor.
And when something goes wrong? They are forced to raise a ticket to an ops team who barely understands the context of the change.
This is organisational malpractice.
Automation is not enough.
Pipelines must be developer-controlled.
Environments must be developer-managed.
Telemetry must be developer-owned.
If your developers are second-class citizens in your own delivery ecosystem, you are manufacturing helplessness at scale.
True DevOps demands that developers have operational agency, including:
This level of ownership must also be reflected in your Definition of Done , ensuring that telemetry and operational readiness are part of what it means for work to be complete.
Agency without feedback is noise.
Feedback without agency is paralysis.
You must have both.
Every time you separate developers from operational decision-making, you break the feedback loop. You turn “continuous” delivery into ceremonial delivery.
You
destroy agility
. You disempower your people. You institutionalise blame instead of learning.
If you want real DevOps, you must give developers real control.
Yes, this requires real trust.
Yes, this demands real engineering maturity.
Yes, this will expose the weaknesses you have been hiding behind process theatre.
But the alternative is worse: a hollow shell of DevOps, where the only thing “continuous” is your excuses for why it still takes six months to learn whether your features work.
If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.
We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.
Xceptor - Process and Data Automation
Trayport
NIT A/S
Genus Breeding Ltd
Higher Education Statistics Agency
Brandes Investment Partners L.P.
Slaughter and May
Alignment Healthcare
Deliotte
Kongsberg Maritime
SuperControl
Schlumberger
Healthgrades
Boxit Document Solutions
MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.
Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)
Freadom
Boeing
Ghana Police Service
Washington Department of Transport
Royal Air Force
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Washington Department of Enterprise Services
Nottingham County Council
NIT A/S
MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.
Hubtel Ghana
Big Data for Humans
Flowmaster (a Mentor Graphics Company)
YearUp.org