a·gen·tic a·gil·i·ty

Deciphering the Enigma of Story Points Across Teams

TL;DR; Story Points are useful for team discussions and backlog refinement but are too subjective for comparing teams or predicting delivery. Focus instead on objective metrics like throughput, cycle time, and work in process to measure and improve team performance, while also considering value delivered using evidence-based management practices. Shift your attention from normalising Story Points to tracking flow metrics and value to make better decisions and optimise outcomes.

Published on
3 minute read
Image
https://nkdagility.com/resources/LKp5S7_4Kbw
Subscribe
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

Over the past decade, a recurring query has been echoing in my ears: “How can we normalise Story Points across teams so that we can look across and maybe compare teams?” It’s high time we address this.

TLDR;

Story Points, while subjective, can be a valuable tool for team discussions and understanding. However, they shouldn’t be the primary metric for comparing teams or predicting future deliverables. Instead, focus on objective metrics like throughput , to gauge and optimise team performance .

These are not the metrics that you are looking for!

First and foremost, Story Points are inherently subjective. They’re influenced by individual perceptions, making them unsuitable for broad comparisons or future projections. While they might offer a vague direction, they’re often misused in planning and measuring.

The essence of agile frameworks like Scrum is value delivery , and the correlation between the subjective nature of story points and their velocity doesn’t necessarily equate to the value delivered. There are better choices for teams aiming to optimise their value delivery than relying solely on Story Points and Velocity.

But is there any value in Story Points?

Aye, there is. In my experience, Story Points can be a great tool during backlog item refinement. They foster discussions, highlighting what’s known and, more importantly, what’s not: Outliers during planning poker often signal gaps in understanding.

Tools like Story Points and Planning Poker can be invaluable in understanding when to dissect items further and spark discussions during refinement. I would expect teams to shift more towards right-sizing, ensuring that backlog items are feasible within a Sprint, as they gain more experience and understanding of the product, its domain, and the technology used.

A Story of Flow and Value

The crux of this discourse lies in two vectors: throughput and value.

It’s straightforward to gauge the throughput of backlog items and their flow. By noting when work enters and exits the system, we can derive the four pivotal flow metrics:

Deciphering the Enigma of Story Points Across Teams

Such metrics empower us to make informed decisions rooted in tangible data. They allow us to pinpoint potential issues, identify items needing further breakdown, and employ probabilistic forecasting for future projections.

Simultaneously, to truly maximise team output, we must also focus on the value of the work. Given its subjective nature, defining value can be multifaceted. A practical approach is to examine the four primary value areas from evidence-based management practices:

Deciphering the Enigma of Story Points Across Teams

The ultimate goal is to enhance both throughput and value concurrently. Striking a balance is crucial; we neither want sluggish excellence nor a barrage of mediocrity.

Smart Classifications

Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.

Subscribe

Connect with Martin Hinshelwood

If you've made it this far, it's worth connecting with our principal consultant and coach, Martin Hinshelwood, for a 30-minute 'ask me anything' call.

Our Happy Clients​

We partner with businesses across diverse industries, including finance, insurance, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, technology, engineering, transportation, hospitality, entertainment, legal, government, and military sectors.​

Ericson Logo

Ericson

Schlumberger Logo

Schlumberger

Microsoft Logo

Microsoft

NIT A/S

Slicedbread Logo

Slicedbread

Lockheed Martin Logo

Lockheed Martin

Teleplan Logo

Teleplan

Philips Logo

Philips

Lean SA Logo

Lean SA

Genus Breeding Ltd Logo

Genus Breeding Ltd

CR2

Big Data for Humans Logo

Big Data for Humans

MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd. Logo

MacDonald Humfrey (Automation) Ltd.

Kongsberg Maritime Logo

Kongsberg Maritime

DFDS Logo

DFDS

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd Logo

Capita Secure Information Solutions Ltd

Graham & Brown Logo

Graham & Brown

Boxit Document Solutions

Washington Department of Transport Logo

Washington Department of Transport

Royal Air Force Logo

Royal Air Force

Department of Work and Pensions (UK) Logo

Department of Work and Pensions (UK)

Washington Department of Enterprise Services Logo

Washington Department of Enterprise Services

Ghana Police Service Logo

Ghana Police Service

New Hampshire Supreme Court Logo

New Hampshire Supreme Court

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation Logo

Xceptor - Process and Data Automation

Slaughter and May Logo

Slaughter and May

Illumina Logo

Illumina

Boeing Logo

Boeing

Ericson Logo

Ericson

Philips Logo

Philips